The United
States has had a policy of not paying ransoms for over a hundred years. A ransom
is a sum of money or other payment
demanded or paid for the release of a prisoner. This isn’t to say
the government isn’t doing everything they can to get the person back, because
they are just by other means. It isn’t until now that President Obama is trying
to make an alteration to that policy. This change would entail the people’s
private ability to raise funds to pay a ransom. The Government still won't be directly paying only helping facilitate (CBS News), in order to not praise the captor
for their bad behavior. What would happen if someone wanted to pay the ransom
of a loved one is that the U.S. government would prosecute the person for
paying. And, probably put them in jail for funding a terrorist organization.
It would seem
like a completely sensible change, however there is a good reason (Economist) it was the
way it was. If the United States doesn’t pay up for a ransom, then what’s the
purpose for capturing a U.S. citizen in the first place? Exactly there’s no
money to be made. This is the logic of the U.S. Government, and it has been
quite successful. In comparison to other European countries that pay ransoms, the
U.S. has had dramatically less abroad citizens kidnapped or captured. So, the
idea that we could pay ransoms could put other Americans at risk.
I think
this relates to the classic ethnic scenario (Wikipedia); "There is a runaway trolley barreling down the railway
tracks. Ahead, on the tracks, there are five people tied up and unable to move.
The trolley is headed straight for them. You are standing some distance off in
the train yard, next to a lever. If you pull this lever, the trolley will
switch to a different set of tracks. However, you notice that there is one
person on the side track. You have two options: (1) Do nothing, and the trolley
kills the five people on the main track. (2) Pull the lever, diverting the
trolley onto the side track where it will kill one person. Which is the correct
choice?"
No comments:
Post a Comment